Friday, March 14, 2014

Roadshow Schedule Summer 2014


 
Sat., June 28, 2014
Appraisal Event — Austin, TX
Sat., July 26, 2014
Appraisal Event — Chicago, IL
Sat., August 9, 2014
Appraisal Event — New York, NY
Sat., August 16, 2014
Appraisal Event — Charleston, WV 

Reflections





Maria Martinez Jar Acquired September 18, 1929


 
Black-on-Black Jar
Maria Martinez
Acquired September 18, 1929
Signed Marie'
Diam. 13"

Red Cloud (1821 - 1919) Gorget


German Silver Gorget
 
Chief Red Cloud
Ex. Coll: William S. Starring
W. 6" (153 mm.)
 


Michael McCullough - An Open Letter Regarding ESA Order 210

 
 
Michael McCullough LLC

155 WaterStreet.3d Floor. Brooklyn, NY 11201 .T: 646.262.7630. F:856.941.5720. Michael@McCulloughLlC.com

March 13,2014

To All Clients and lnterested Parties

Re: DIRECTOR'S ORDER NO. 2l0


Dear AIl:

By now, many of you have heard about the recent Order No.210 (the "Order) that sets policies and procedure for U.S. Fish and Wildllfe Service (the "Service") with regard to the
import, export and sale of elephant ivory and parts of other species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (the "ESA"). I have received many inquiries over the past two
weeks about why this is happening and what can be done about it.

Why was the Order issued?

The mass killing of elephants and rhinoceros over the past several years is a serious problem. White the killing of these animals has been a problem for decades, the increased rate
of killings has alarmed many people around the world. The plight of the elephant, in particular, should be of great concern to everybody, and the lack of focus this issue has received in the past has led to the very strict rules in the Order.

What does the Order do?

The Order reinterprets the ESA to impose the following new requirements on the commercial trade of ESA-listed endangered species:

. All African elephant ivory is prohibited from import into the U.S., regardless of the age of the object or the antique status of the ivory.

. All ESA-listed endangered species other than African elephant ivory (such as tortoiseshell, rhinoceros horn, whalebone, etc.) can be imported only if the object is
antique (over 100 years old).

African elephant ivory and all other ESA-listed endangered species can be sold in interstate commerce only if the object is antique (over 100 years old) and the owner has
documentary proof that the object was Iegally imported into the U.S. after 1982.

African elephant ivory and all other ESA-listed endangered species can be exported only if the object is antique (over 100 years old) and the owner has documentary proof
that the object was legally imported into the U.S. after 1982.

' For a short period of time and due to technical requirements of the law, items made from African elephant ivory can still be
sold in interstate commerce and exported even if they are not antique. Exporters should be wary of this exception because the export of African elephant ivory requires a CITES permit issued by the Service, and this exception is likely to be revoked before a CITES permit could be issued. Sellers in interstate commerce should obtain specific legal advice prior to sale.

2 See note l, above.

ln all instances listed above, the species identification of the wildlife material on the object and the antique status of the object must be certified in writing by a 3d party expert who has no interest in the sale of the object.

* ln all instances listed above, an object that otherwise qualifies as an antique will lose its antique status if the object was repaired or modified with new endangered species
material after December 27,1973.

How does the Order affect the art market?

The Order was meant to have a drastic impact upon the art market. ln the past, some importers have used the ESA's antique exception "to 'cover trafficking in newly poached ivory," so the Service has impose these new rules on all importers, exporters and sellers of ESA-listed endangered species.
 
Professional art dealers, collectors, auction houses and museums only import, export and trade in art objects that are certifiably antiques. These art market players have the
academic credentials and practical experience in the market to determine which objects are certifiably antique. But the Order does not allow certified antiques to be traded in interstate commerce unless the owner can prove that the object was legally imported into the U.S. after 1982.

Therefore, the following objects are excluded from the art market:
 
 
*All American-made antique objects containing ESA listed endangered species; .
* All antique object containing ESA-listed endangered species imported prior to 1982: 
*All antique objects containing ESA-listed endangered species imported after 1982 for which the owners no longer have copies of the import documents.
 
 ln consequence of the Order, most of the antique objects in private and museum collections that contain ESA listed endangered species have no market value.

What can be done to address this problem?

My firm is organizing a meeting on March 18,2014 from 6:30-8:30 in New York City for all interested collectors, dealers, auctioneers, and museums to discuss the Order, as well as discuss some solutions for maintaining a legal trade in art objects containing endangered species. Those interested in attending the meeting should contact me at Michael@ McCulloughLLG. com



Sincerely,
signed
Michael McCullough





 

 

 

Thursday, March 13, 2014

FixESA.org - New Website for Endangered Species Act Info



 
 
 
This is an important website that provides and will continue to provide information on the process of finding answers to the Endangered Species Act. Hope you will check it out.

Boston Museum of Fine Arts - The Lehman Collection of African Ivory

This past year the Boston Museum of Fine Arts was given some very important bronze, brass, and ivory objects from the Lehman African Art Collection. I have listed below the ivory objects listed by Boston as being part of this donation. It is interesting to speculate how this appraisal would have happened had it taken place after February 24, 2014. As an appraiser that has looked at this material for over thirty years, I am not certain that I could legally appraise it if the donation occurred after the 24th. Before I accepted the assignment I would get a legal opinion that provided guidance on any potential liability. I can say unequivocally that the value of these ivory objects is lower today than it was in January of this year. The ivory saltcellar which is illustrated here is 16th century and sold at Sothebys London for 6000 pounds in 1974. We don't know when this came into the United States but assuming it was the same year then under the old rules it would be described as "pre act". Under the new rules it is my understanding that it could only be sold within the state in which the owner resides. I haven't researched objects like this but it seems reasonable to me based on other objects of comparable importance and quality that the fair market value could be in excess of $1,000,000. After February 24th the market shrinks considerably to buyers within the owner's state. Many museums will need now to reassess their collections and their loans to ensure that they comply with the new direction of ESA.


1. Container
Edo peoples, Benin kingdom, Nigeria, 19th century
Ivory
Length x width: 11.4 x 6.4 cm (4 1/2 x 2 1/2 in.)
Robert Owen Lehman Collection
Provenance:
Merton D. Simpson Gallery, New York; sold by Simpson to Robert Owen Lehman; 2012, promised gift of Robert
Owen Lehman to the MFA.


2. Saltcellar
Sapi peoples, Sierra Leone and Guinea, late 15th–early 16th century
Ivory
Height x width: 6 x 3 3/4 in. (15.2 x 9.5 cm)
Robert Owen Lehman Collection
Provenance:
With Charles Ratton (b. 1895 – d. 1986), Paris. J.J. Klejman (b. 1906 – d. 1995), New York. 2012, promised gift
of Robert Owen Lehman to the MFA.


3. Saltcellar
Sapi peoples, Sierra Leone and Guinea, late 15th–early 16th century
Ivory
Height x width: 10 x 4 in. (25.4 x 10.2 cm)
Robert Owen Lehman Collection
Provenance:
July 8, 1974, anonymous (“various properties”) sale, Sotheby’s, London, lot 84, sold for £6000 to Robinson. 2012,
promised gift of Robert Owen Lehman to the MFA.


4. Pendant with a Queen Mother (Iyoba) playing a gong
Edo peoples, Benin kingdom, Nigeria, late 17th–early 18th century
Ivory
Length x width: 17.1 x 10.2 cm (6 3/4 x 4 in.)
Robert Owen Lehman Collection
Provenance:
Early 20th century, brought from the Kingdom of Benin to England. 1961, Colonel Albert Horton, England;
February 6, 1961, Colonel Horton sale, Sotheby’s, London, lot 152, sold for £ 880 to K. John Hewett (b. 1919 – d.
1994), London. 2012, promised gift of Robert Owen Lehman to the MFA.


5. Staff showing a military commander on horseback
Edo peoples, Benin kingdom, Nigeria, 18th century
Ivory
Height x width: 16 x 4 in. (40.6 x 10.2 cm)
Robert Owen Lehman Collection
Provenance:
April 4, 1898, sale, J. C. Stevens Auction Rooms, London, lot 155, sold for £ 25.70 to Lt.-General Augustus Henry
Pitt-Rivers (b. 1827 - d. 1900), Farnham, England; until the 1960s, kept at the Pitt-Rivers Museum, Farnham, and
passed by descent within the family [see note]; 1970s, sold upon the dispersal of the collection. 2012, promised gift
of Robert Owen Lehman to the MFA.
NOTE:
The collection of the privately-owned Pitt-Rivers museum passed by descent through Augustus Henry Pitt-Rivers’s
son Alexander Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers to his grandson, Captain George Pitt-Rivers (1890-1966) and his common law
wife, Stella Howson-Clive (Pitt-Rivers). The museum closed in the 1960s and the collection was sold.

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

My Word Winter 2014


Christmas 2013 seems like it occurred about twenty years ago. Much has happened and unfortunately not much is good news. We promised that we would cover the Detroit bankruptcy and how it will impact the art museum. We have a piece in this issue that will undoubtedly provide more information that you would ever want to know about the subject. But it is ever changing and we will stay on top of it. Repatriation and our government's ongoing efforts to get involved with both private and public art purchases promises to only become more intrusive to everyone's detriment. The latest bomb shell for the art and antiques world came with Fish and Wildlife Director's Order 210 which was effective February 24th of this year. This issue of the Newsletter has focused on this and the Endangered Species Act. A casual reading of all this information might cause one to wonder why the reader should care. The Forbes article answers this question by questioning how objects acquired in good faith by buyers obeying all the rules should now become worthless to the owner. I appraised an ivory elephant tusk a few years ago for $5,000 to $7,000 that had been acquired by missionaries living in the Congo in the mid 1940s. If the owners can prove it came into the States prior to 1975 they can at the moment sell the tusk within the State of Texas. My sources are telling me the sale of all ivory could be banned in the US within the near future. At this point the tusk will truly be worthless.  My sources are also saying that we can look for bans encompassing other endangered species as well. I understand conservation and efforts to preserve our environment. I don't understand how you can justify violating individual rights of those who were legal owners of family heirlooms last week and are now potential criminals if they unknowingly sell their objects. There will be political pressure from both liberals and conservatives alike. I certainly can't imagine this being endorsed by museums. But we will cover it.. JB

Endangered Species Act Director's Order 210 - Why Should You Care

Many of you reading this will see Director's Order 210 for the first time and will, I suspect, wonder why you didn't see the lights on the oncoming train. Last summer I attended a briefing from Fish and Wildlife on the importation and sale of endangered species material - which runs the gamut from animal products to fauna. During the conversation on ivory the representative from Fish and Wildlife casually mentioned that ivory that was legally imported and sold once could not be legally sold again. This inspired many questions that were not adequately answered, but it made a number of my colleagues very uneasy.

Fish and Wildlife issued Director's Order 210 on February 24 effective immediately which codified our concerns. I have printed below in its entirety the order with a separate accompanying fact sheet. Mike McCullough, a highly regarded lawyer and specialist in these matters has been working with the art and antiques community to come up with a solution. I have also in this newsletter printed that in its entirety.

The Endangered Species Act is complex, confusing and encumbered by ever changing regulations that in themselves tend to become the governing force of the very broad and somewhat obscure legislation. I have provided background material with links in a separate piece in this newsletter. In the event you find this material tedious, I have highlighted and italicized sections of interest.

Some might say that we need to protect the elephants and we all need to sacrifice to preserve our environment. I wish it were that simple. Symbolic gestures obfuscate the real problems and the solutions. I believe Order 210 is a beginning and not an end and real motive of our government is to stop the selling of any endangered species regardless of past laws or the age of the object. Yes it is amazing what you can do with a pen and a phone.


Director's Order 210

 
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D.C. 20240

DIRECTOR’S ORDER NO. 210

Subject: Administrative Actions to Strengthen U.S. Trade Controls for Elephant Ivory, Rhinoceros Horn, and Parts and Products of Other Species Listed Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

Sec. 1 What is the purpose of this Order?

a. The United States released the first National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking on February 11, 2014. One of the three strategic priorities of the National Strategy is to strengthen domestic and global enforcement, including assessing related laws, regulations, and enforcement tools.

b. This Order establishes policy and procedure for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) employees to implement the National Strategy as it relates to the trade in elephant ivory, rhinoceros horn, and parts and products of other ESA-listed species.

c. The Order supersedes all previous policies on the June 9, 1989, African Elephant Conservation Act (AECA) import moratorium.

Sec. 2 What will Service employees do under this Order?

a. Service employees must strictly implement and enforce all criteria under the ESA antique exception (16 U.S.C. 1539 (h)). The ESA requires that any person claiming the benefit of a statutory exemption has the burden of proving that the exemption is applicable (16 U.S.C. 1539 (g)) so the burden of proof is on the importer, exporter, or seller to definitively show that an item meets all of the criteria under the exception. The burden of proof standard is high to ensure that items that people claim are antiques under the ESA exception are authentic and qualify for the exception. See Appendix 1 for additional guidance.

b. Service employees must strictly implement and enforce the June 9, 1989, AECA moratorium (54 Fed. Reg. 24758) on the importation of raw and worked African elephant ivory while, as a matter of law enforcement discretion, allowing importation of certain parts and products, as follows:

(1) Raw or worked African elephant ivory imported by an employee or agent of a Federal, State, or tribal government agency for law enforcement purposes.

(2) Raw or worked African elephant ivory imported for genuine scientific purposes that will contribute to conservation of the species.

(3) Worked African elephant ivory imported for personal use as part of a household move or as part of an inheritance, provided that the worked elephant ivory:

· Was legally acquired prior to February 26, 1976;

· Has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another person for financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976; and

· The item is accompanied by a valid Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) pre-Convention certificate.

(4) Worked African elephant ivory imported as part of a musical instrument, provided that the worked elephant ivory:

· Was legally acquired prior to February 26, 1976;

· Has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another person for financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976;

· The person or group qualifies for a CITES musical instrument certificate; and

· The musical instrument containing elephant ivory is accompanied by a valid CITES musical instrument certificate or an equivalent CITES document that meets all of the requirements of CITES Resolution Conf. 16.8.

(5) Worked African elephant ivory imported as part of a travelling exhibition, provided that the worked elephant ivory:

· Was legally acquired prior to February 26, 1976;

· Has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another person for financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976;

· The person or group qualifies for a CITES travelling exhibition certificate; and

· The item containing elephant ivory is accompanied by a valid CITES travelling exhibition certificate or an equivalent CITES document that meets the requirements of 50 CFR 23.49.

Sec. 3 Does this Order affect other legal requirements?

a. The AECA moratorium does not apply to raw or worked African elephant ivory imported as part of a sport-hunted trophy, or to ivory from other species.

b. Nothing in this Order affects the ESA or CITES in-transit standards and requirements.

c. The AECA moratorium does not apply to the tusks on live elephants, so nothing in this Order affects the importation of live elephants.

d. Nothing in this Order affects the prohibitions under the AECA or the ESA. In addition to the terms of the June 9, 1989, moratorium and the prohibitions under the AECA, all applicable legal requirements for the importation of African elephant ivory under 50 CFR Parts 13, 14, 17, and 23 must also be met.

Sec. 4. When is this Order effective? This Order is effective immediately. It remains in effect until incorporated into the Service Manual or until amended, superseded, or revoked, whichever comes first. If we do not amend, supersede, or revoke it, the Order will terminate in 18 months.

/sgd/ Daniel M. Ashe

DIRECTOR

Date: February 25, 2014
 
Fact Sheet
 
Questions and Answers about Director’s Order No. 210
Administrative Actions to Strengthen U.S. Trade Controls for
Elephant Ivory, Rhinoceros Horn, and Parts and Products of other ESA-listed Species
What does the Director’s Order do?
The Order instructs U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel to strictly enforce existing restrictions on the commercial trade of elephant ivory and on the import, export and sale of items made from other protected species under the “antiques exception” of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
What is the ESA antiques exception?
Under the ESA, the import, export and interstate sale (sale across state lines) of listed species or their parts is prohibited without an ESA permit except for items that qualify as “antique”.
To qualify as antique, the importer, exporter or seller must show that the item meets all of these criteria:
• It is 100 years or older;
• It is composed in whole or in part of an ESA-listed species;
• It has not been repaired or modified with any such species after December 27, 1973; and
• It is being or was imported through an endangered species “antique port.”
This strict enforcement of the ESA applies to items made from rhinoceros, sea turtle and any other ESA-protected species.
Can I import antique items containing African elephant ivory for commercial purposes?
No. The Service no longer allows any commercial importation of African elephant ivory. This prohibition, which was originally established via the 1989 African Elephant Conservation Act (AECA) moratorium, will apply even to items that qualify as antiques under the ESA.
Why did the Service issue this Order?
The changes are necessary for the Service to protect populations of elephants and other endangered or threatened species that are subject to illegal trade. Poaching and illegal trade have been decimating African elephant and rhinoceros populations in recent years. Traffickers have been claiming that elephant ivory that has been poached and illegally exported from the country of origin is ‘antique’, sometimes even staining it to make it look old. The changes in this Order are among a set of administrative actions specifically called for under the National Strategy on Combating Wildlife Trafficking, which was issued by President Obama on February 11, 2014.
Will any imports of African elephant ivory be allowed under the AECA moratorium?
Yes. The AECA itself authorized the continued importation of legally acquired sport-hunted trophies with proper documentation. We will continue to allow the import of sport-hunted trophies and certain other types of non-commercial imports.
What African elephant ivory can still be imported?
The following can still be imported:
• Raw or worked African elephant ivory imported by a federal, state or tribal agency for law enforcement purposes
• Raw or worked African elephant ivory imported for scientific purposes that will contribute to the conservation of African elephants
• Worked African elephant ivory imported for personal use as part of a household move or an inheritance that meets specific criteria (see below)
• Worked African elephant ivory imported as part of a musical instrument that meets specific criteria (see below)
• Worked African elephant ivory imported as part of a traveling exhibition that meets specific criteria (see below)
• African elephant ivory as part of a personal sport-hunted trophy
Why is the Service allowing these limited imports to continue, but restricting the importation of antiques made from African elephant ivory?
The United States is a market for objects made from African elephant ivory, which drives increasing poaching of wild elephants. The Service has determined that it must take every administrative and regulatory action to cut off import of raw and worked elephant ivory where that importation is for commercial purposes. Allowing imports for law enforcement and scientific purposes is in line with the Service’s mission to help conserve African elephants and stop trafficking in African elephant ivory. The other limited exceptions allow movement into the United States legally possessed African elephant ivory that predates the listing under the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) for personal use as part of a household move or inheritance, musical performances, and traveling exhibitions. Each of these types of import must meet specific criteria. And unlike the commercial antiques trade, none of these types of imports has been used by smugglers to “cover” trafficking in newly poached ivory.
How can worked African elephant ivory be imported for personal use?
You may only import worked African elephant ivory for personal use as part of a household move or as part of an inheritance provided that the ivory was legally acquired before February 26, 1976; the ivory has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another person in pursuit of financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976; and the item is accompanied by a valid Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) pre-Convention certificate.
How can worked African elephant ivory be imported as part of a musical instrument?
You may import worked African elephant ivory as part of a musical instrument provided that the ivory was legally acquired before February 26, 1976; the ivory has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another person in the pursuit of financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976; the person or group qualifies for a CITES musical instrument certificate; and the musical instrument containing elephant ivory is accompanied by a valid CITES musical instrument certificate or an equivalent CITES document that meets the requirements of CITES Resolution Conf. 16.8.
How can worked African elephant ivory be imported as part of a traveling exhibition?
Worked African elephant ivory may be imported as part of a traveling exhibition, such as a museum or art show, provided that the ivory was legally acquired prior to February 26, 1976; the worked elephant ivory has not subsequently been transferred from one person to another in the pursuit of financial gain or profit since February 26, 1976; the person or group qualifies for a CITES traveling exhibition certificate; and the item containing elephant ivory is accompanied by a valid CITES traveling exhibition certificate or an equivalent CITES document that meets the requirements of CITES Resolution Conf. 16.8.
Can raw African elephant ivory be imported for personal use, as a musical instrument, or as part of a traveling exhibition?
No. Raw African elephant ivory can only be imported as part of a personal sport-hunted trophy.
What is an endangered species antique port?
In establishing the antique exception under the ESA, Congress directed what was then the U.S. Customs Service to identify specific ports of entry where antiques made from endangered and threatened species can be imported. There are 13 of these locations: Boston, Massachusetts; New York, New York; Baltimore, Maryland; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Miami, Florida; San Juan, Puerto Rico; New Orleans, Louisiana; Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, California; San Francisco, California; Anchorage, Alaska; Honolulu, Hawaii; and Chicago, Illinois.
What are the requirements to import an antique made from an ESA-listed species?
• ESA antiques may only be imported at a port designated for the import of ESA antiques.
• The import of ESA antiques requires the filing of a Declaration for Import or Export of Wildlife (Form 3-177) with documentation demonstrating that the item meets the ESA exception.
• For ESA antiques made from species that are also listed under CITES, the importer or the importer’s agent must file Form 3-177 and all required documentation directly with the Service.
• For ESA antiques made from species that are not listed under CITES, the importer or the importer’s agent may file Form 3-177 and all accompanying documentation with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Port Director. CBP will forward all documentation to the Service for a legal determination prior to release. The importer or the importer’s agent may also file directly with the Service and provide the necessary clearance to CBP.
• The commercial import of ESA antiques must meet all licensing and fee requirements for wildlife imports and exports.
• The import of ESA antiques made from species that are also listed under CITES requires a pre-Convention certificate issued by the CITES Management Authority of the (re)exporting country as part of the declaration
• The import of ESA antiques does not require an ESA import permit.
• The importer must provide documented evidence of species identification and age to demonstrate that the article qualifies as an ESA antique. This may include a qualified appraisal, documents that provide detailed provenance, and/or scientific testing. Notarized statements or affidavits by the importer or a CITES pre-Convention certificate alone are not necessarily adequate proof that the article meets the ESA exception.
What are the requirements to export an antique made from an ESA-listed species?
• ESA antiques may only be exported at a Service designated port or at a port authorized under a designated port exception permit.
• The export of ESA antiques must meet all of the Service’s standard declaration, license, fee, notification, and clearance requirements for wildlife trade. CBP is not involved in the export of such antiques.
• The export of ESA antiques does not require an ESA export permit.
• The export of ESA antiques from species that are also listed under CITES requires a pre-Convention certificate issued by the U.S. CITES Management Authority as part of the export declaration package.
• The exporter must prove that the antique article had been previously imported and met all of the criteria for import under the ESA antique exception.
How does the U.S. importer document the identification of the species used in an ESA antique?
The person claiming the benefit of the ESA antique exception must definitively prove the identity of the species of which the article is composed in whole or in part. Such proof can be in the form of bona fide DNA analysis, a qualified appraisal, or other documentation that definitively demonstrates the identification of the species through a detailed provenance of the article.
How does the U.S. importer document the age of an ESA antique?
The person claiming the benefit of the ESA exception must definitively prove that the article is not less than 100 years of age. Such proof can be in the form of bona fide testing using scientifically approved aging methods by a laboratory or facility accredited to conduct such tests,
a qualified appraisal, or another method that documents the age by establishing the origin of the article. The provenance may be determined through a detailed history of the article, including but not limited to family photos, ethnographic fieldwork or other information that authenticates the article and assigns the work to a known period of time or, where possible, to a known artist.
How does the U.S. exporter or seller within the United States document that their article meets the ESA exception for antiques?
The burden of proof is on the exporter or seller to show that the antique article was previously imported and met all of the criteria under the ESA exception. See Section 2 above for the requirements to import an article made from an ESA-listed species and the type of documentation that was required upon import. Notarized statements or affidavits by the exporter or seller, or a CITES pre-Convention certificate alone are not adequate proof that the article meets the ESA exception.
What will the Service accept as a qualified appraisal?
An appraisal submitted as documentary evidence of an article’s eligibility under the ESA antique exception must meet the following criteria:
• The person executing the appraisal either has earned an appraisal designation from a recognized professional appraiser organization for demonstrated competency in appraising the type of property being appraised or can demonstrates verifiable education and experience in assessing the type of property being appraised.
• The person executing the appraisal is not the importer, exporter, buyer, recipient or seller of the article; does not benefit from the results of the appraisal (other than for the cost of the appraisal); is not a party to any of the transactions associated with the article (including any person acting as an agent for the transaction); is not an employee of any business that is a party to the transaction; and is not related to the person claiming the exception.
• Facts we will examine in determining the reliability of the appraisal:
o A description of the article in sufficient detail for a person who is not generally familiar with the type of article to determine that the appraisal is about the article in question.
o The name and address of the qualified appraiser, or if the appraiser is a partner, an employee, or an independent contractor engaged by a person other than the person claiming the exception, the name and address of the partnership or the person who employs or engages the appraiser.
o The qualifications of the appraiser who signs the appraisal, including the background, experience, education, and any membership in professional appraiser associations.
o The date on which the article was appraised.
o The scientific method in detail used to determine the age or species.
o Descriptive information on the article including but not limited to: the size of the article; the medium; the artist or culture; approximate date the article was created; and a professional quality image of the article.
o A detailed history of the article including proof of authenticity.
o The facts on which the appraisal was based including analyses of similar works by the artist on or around the creation date.
What articles do not qualify for the antique exception under the ESA?
• Articles that are less than 100 years old.
• Articles that are not composed in whole or in part of an ESA-listed species.
• Articles with repairs or modifications made on or after December 28, 1973, to the specific part or component of the article that is made of the ESA-listed species regardless of the age or origin of the parts used to repair or modify the specimen.1
• Articles that have been repaired with the addition of any part of the ESA-listed species or modified with the addition of any part of the ESA-listed species on or after December 28, 1973 regardless of the age or origin of the parts used to repair or modify the specimen.
• Articles that were imported prior to the creation of designated ports for ESA antiques (September 22, 1982).
• Articles that are, or were, imported on or after September 22, 1982 at a port that was not designated for ESA antiques.
• Articles that were created in the United States and never imported.
How will rigorous enforcement of the criteria for the ESA antiques exception affect import, export and interstate sale of African elephant ivory?
As noted previously, commercial imports of African elephant ivory antiques are prohibited under the AECA moratorium and will no longer be allowed under any circumstance.
Under a special rule that has not yet been revoked, items made from African elephant ivory can still be sold across State lines and exported whether they qualify for the ESA antiques exception or not. We are working on the regulatory action needed to change this regulation. In the meantime, exporters of worked African elephant ivory must comply with CITES requirements and be able to document that the item is made from African (rather than Asian) elephant ivory. Such proof can be in the form of bona fide DNA analysis, a qualified appraisal, or other documentation that definitively demonstrates the identification of the species through a detailed provenance of the article.
How will rigorous enforcement of the criteria for the ESA antiques exception affect import, export and interstate sale of Asian elephant ivory or products made from other ESA-listed species?
The person engaging in these activities will need to show that the item meets all of the ESA criteria for antiques.
What are the penalties for violating the ESA?
1 Items with repairs or modifications to parts or components of the item not made from an ESA-listed species may be entitled to the exception if all other requirements are met. Items that have been repaired or modified prior to December 28, 1973 may also be entitled to the exception if all other requirements are met.
The maximum penalty for violating the ESA is one year in prison and a $100,000 fine for an individual, $200,000 for an organization. Those who engage in illegal wildlife trade under the ESA may also face prosecution under the Lacey Act's anti-trafficking provisions (maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and fines of $250,000 for an individual or $500,000 for an organization).
Is it illegal to create or submit false paperwork to claim that an item qualifies as antique under the ESA antique exception?
Yes. The Lacey Act makes it illegal to produce or submit any false record, account, label for, or false identification of wildlife being transported in interstate or international commerce (maximum penalty 5 years in prison and fines of $250,000 for an individual, $500,000 for an organization). Making false statements and using false documents violates 18 U.S.C. 1001 (maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and fines of $250,000 for an individual, $500,000 for an organization).